<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scatterbrain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=scatterbrain</link>
	<description>The musings of Martin "FredFredrickson" Crownover</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5901</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5901</guid>
		<description>Haha, nah...  I just like to come up with &quot;witty&quot; titles (often they are not all that witty :P).  I&#039;m not sure where I picked that habit up, but I think it came from my days working for my local newspaper.  I didn&#039;t write anything for the newspaper, but I got a kick out of the things the writers / editor did, and I guess I might have picked up some of their habits as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, nah&#8230;  I just like to come up with &#8220;witty&#8221; titles (often they are not all that witty <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> ).  I&#8217;m not sure where I picked that habit up, but I think it came from my days working for my local newspaper.  I didn&#8217;t write anything for the newspaper, but I got a kick out of the things the writers / editor did, and I guess I might have picked up some of their habits as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5900</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 00:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5900</guid>
		<description>The first is probably my fav of the bunch there, Xot.  Wolverine Mickey FTW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first is probably my fav of the bunch there, Xot.  Wolverine Mickey FTW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dangerous_Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5891</link>
		<dc:creator>Dangerous_Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 05:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5891</guid>
		<description>Seems to me this post is less about random thoughts and more about witty subtitles :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me this post is less about random thoughts and more about witty subtitles <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattthew_H</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5881</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattthew_H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 10:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5881</guid>
		<description>Yeah, it&#039;d leave mark on any games frames per second rate....and your wallet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, it&#8217;d leave mark on any games frames per second rate&#8230;.and your wallet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xot</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5872</link>
		<dc:creator>xot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 15:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5872</guid>
		<description>More of the same for your mocking pleasure:
http://kotaku.com/5349732/the-disney-marvel-team+ups-wed-like-to-see</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of the same for your mocking pleasure:<br />
<a href="http://kotaku.com/5349732/the-disney-marvel-team+ups-wed-like-to-see" rel="nofollow">http://kotaku.com/5349732/the-disney-marvel-team+ups-wed-like-to-see</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5867</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 23:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5867</guid>
		<description>Haha, that&#039;s awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haha, that&#8217;s awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kc lc</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>kc lc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 09:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>Perhaps this foretells the perils ahead:

http://images.theweek.com/dir_28/the_week_14428_27.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps this foretells the perils ahead:</p>
<p><a href="http://images.theweek.com/dir_28/the_week_14428_27.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://images.theweek.com/dir_28/the_week_14428_27.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5862</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5862</guid>
		<description>Oh, and that PC you linked to looks pretty beefy...  and pretty pricey!  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and that PC you linked to looks pretty beefy&#8230;  and pretty pricey!  <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5860</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5860</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll probably write an official blog post about this sometime in the future, but here&#039;s what I&#039;m currently looking at:

CPU: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83Ghz&lt;/a&gt;
I checked out the i7&#039;s as well, and while they seem to be a pretty significant upgrade over the Core 2 Duo I have now, most of the reviews I&#039;ve read say they aren&#039;t worth the price if you&#039;ve got a faster quad core.  I also don&#039;t want to spend more than ~$200 for a processor, so this seems like good bang for the buck.  It also has a 12mb cache.

RAM: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231276&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;G.Skill 4Gb DDR3 1333 (PC10666)&lt;/a&gt;
This is something I&#039;m not entirely decided upon yet, but for a new system, I want at least 4Gb RAM.  Most of the mobo&#039;s I&#039;ve looked at have 4 slots for RAM, so if I start with 4 and add 4 more later, I think that might be a good route to go.  This G.Skill RAM is also the fastest one they have as far as latency is concerned.  The features for this RAM makes it sound like it might not be compatible with anything but the i5 / i7 processors and P55 motherboards, but I&#039;ve never heard of anything like that before.  I&#039;ll be keeping that in mind though, as I continue to work toward a final build for the new rig.

GPU: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814103076&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Diamond Radeon HD 4890 1Gb 256-bit GDDR5  PCI-E 2.0 16x&lt;/a&gt;
Though i actually prefer nVidia cards, as they tend to be cheaper (and often more powerful), lately I&#039;ve been hearing a lot of good things about the Radeon HD cards.  A friend of mine recommended this card to me, and after reading reviews, I think this might be the one I want.  Most everything I&#039;ve read tip their hand to ATI for this generation of GPU&#039;s, and having one that could be improved upon later by adding a second seems like a good idea this time around.  I&#039;d probably have to get a better power supply to do that, but that is way down the road, and just a matter of future-proofing the new computer so I don&#039;t have to buy all news parts the next time one of them decides to go dead.  I checked out the GeForce GTX line as well, but they seemed a little underpowered for the price.  I really want to get a decent GPU without spending more than ~$200, and this one seems to fit the bill nicely.  Of course, as with the other parts I mentioned above, this is all up in the air right now, and I&#039;m going to mull over it for another day or so before I decide exactly what parts I&#039;m going to get.

About the Xbox, I know it will be pretty barren once another Xbox comes out, but with Microsoft pouring a lot of work into Project Natal, which they have insisted is only going to be a peripheral for the current Xbox, I&#039;m not too worried about it.  When they do decide to release a new Xbox on the public, I&#039;ll probably wait to see if, first, it looks like a good piece of hardware and will have good game support, and second, whether or not my friends are going to get one.  I&#039;ve had a lot of fun times with my current Xbox, but most of them have been because I&#039;ve had a lot of friends to play games with on it.  I&#039;m confident that Microsoft won&#039;t drop the ball with Xbox 3, but I don&#039;t think we&#039;ll see anything like that on the market before holiday season 2010.

Anyway, I&#039;ll keep you guys updated on my system buying experience here...  maybe once I get all the parts I&#039;ll do a photo gallery of the assembly as well.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll probably write an official blog post about this sometime in the future, but here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m currently looking at:</p>
<p>CPU: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16819115041" rel="nofollow">Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 Yorkfield 2.83Ghz</a><br />
I checked out the i7&#8242;s as well, and while they seem to be a pretty significant upgrade over the Core 2 Duo I have now, most of the reviews I&#8217;ve read say they aren&#8217;t worth the price if you&#8217;ve got a faster quad core.  I also don&#8217;t want to spend more than ~$200 for a processor, so this seems like good bang for the buck.  It also has a 12mb cache.</p>
<p>RAM: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231276" rel="nofollow">G.Skill 4Gb DDR3 1333 (PC10666)</a><br />
This is something I&#8217;m not entirely decided upon yet, but for a new system, I want at least 4Gb RAM.  Most of the mobo&#8217;s I&#8217;ve looked at have 4 slots for RAM, so if I start with 4 and add 4 more later, I think that might be a good route to go.  This G.Skill RAM is also the fastest one they have as far as latency is concerned.  The features for this RAM makes it sound like it might not be compatible with anything but the i5 / i7 processors and P55 motherboards, but I&#8217;ve never heard of anything like that before.  I&#8217;ll be keeping that in mind though, as I continue to work toward a final build for the new rig.</p>
<p>GPU: <a href="http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814103076" rel="nofollow">Diamond Radeon HD 4890 1Gb 256-bit GDDR5  PCI-E 2.0 16x</a><br />
Though i actually prefer nVidia cards, as they tend to be cheaper (and often more powerful), lately I&#8217;ve been hearing a lot of good things about the Radeon HD cards.  A friend of mine recommended this card to me, and after reading reviews, I think this might be the one I want.  Most everything I&#8217;ve read tip their hand to ATI for this generation of GPU&#8217;s, and having one that could be improved upon later by adding a second seems like a good idea this time around.  I&#8217;d probably have to get a better power supply to do that, but that is way down the road, and just a matter of future-proofing the new computer so I don&#8217;t have to buy all news parts the next time one of them decides to go dead.  I checked out the GeForce GTX line as well, but they seemed a little underpowered for the price.  I really want to get a decent GPU without spending more than ~$200, and this one seems to fit the bill nicely.  Of course, as with the other parts I mentioned above, this is all up in the air right now, and I&#8217;m going to mull over it for another day or so before I decide exactly what parts I&#8217;m going to get.</p>
<p>About the Xbox, I know it will be pretty barren once another Xbox comes out, but with Microsoft pouring a lot of work into Project Natal, which they have insisted is only going to be a peripheral for the current Xbox, I&#8217;m not too worried about it.  When they do decide to release a new Xbox on the public, I&#8217;ll probably wait to see if, first, it looks like a good piece of hardware and will have good game support, and second, whether or not my friends are going to get one.  I&#8217;ve had a lot of fun times with my current Xbox, but most of them have been because I&#8217;ve had a lot of friends to play games with on it.  I&#8217;m confident that Microsoft won&#8217;t drop the ball with Xbox 3, but I don&#8217;t think we&#8217;ll see anything like that on the market before holiday season 2010.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ll keep you guys updated on my system buying experience here&#8230;  maybe once I get all the parts I&#8217;ll do a photo gallery of the assembly as well.  <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattthew_H</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/09/01/scatterbrain/comment-page-1/#comment-5856</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattthew_H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 06:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=1264#comment-5856</guid>
		<description>I just remembered, and I probably should have put it in the other post, but I&#039;m actually looking for a new PC at the moment - http://www.infinitycomputer.com.au/content/index.php?view=article&amp;catid=13%3Aintel3&amp;id=10%3Asystemax-gaming-intel&amp;tmpl=component&amp;print=1&amp;layout=default&amp;page=&amp;option=com_content&amp;Itemid=19 - something similar to that, but maybe with more power (what can I say, I want a PC that will last me a while). :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just remembered, and I probably should have put it in the other post, but I&#8217;m actually looking for a new PC at the moment &#8211; <a href="http://www.infinitycomputer.com.au/content/index.php?view=article&#038;catid=13%3Aintel3&#038;id=10%3Asystemax-gaming-intel&#038;tmpl=component&#038;print=1&#038;layout=default&#038;page=&#038;option=com_content&#038;Itemid=19" rel="nofollow">http://www.infinitycomputer.com.au/content/index.php?view=article&#038;catid=13%3Aintel3&#038;id=10%3Asystemax-gaming-intel&#038;tmpl=component&#038;print=1&#038;layout=default&#038;page=&#038;option=com_content&#038;Itemid=19</a> &#8211; something similar to that, but maybe with more power (what can I say, I want a PC that will last me a while). <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

