<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Response to a Fignorant GamesRadar Article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fugly-gamesradar-article</link>
	<description>The musings of Martin "FredFredrickson" Crownover</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 04:16:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: moth</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-12051</link>
		<dc:creator>moth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 17:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-12051</guid>
		<description>Most of their journalists are a bunch o pricks,only one or two you can take seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of their journalists are a bunch o pricks,only one or two you can take seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-11577</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-11577</guid>
		<description>Hey, I&#039;ve got a great sense of humor.  But what is the point of making jokes about material you obviously have no understanding of?  It just spreads misinformation and makes you look stupid.

I&#039;m not really sure why you would think I was jealous, or what exactly I am supposed to be jealous of, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I&#8217;ve got a great sense of humor.  But what is the point of making jokes about material you obviously have no understanding of?  It just spreads misinformation and makes you look stupid.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not really sure why you would think I was jealous, or what exactly I am supposed to be jealous of, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-11553</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-11553</guid>
		<description>Sounds to me like pure jealousy.  Get a sense of humour Martin! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds to me like pure jealousy.  Get a sense of humour Martin! <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8507</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-8507</guid>
		<description>Sure, it&#039;s an opinion piece, but it comes from such an ignorant point of view, something had to be said about it.  I&#039;ve played many of these games, and as an artist, I&#039;ve always appreciated them.  They are great examples of what you can do with a very restrictive medium, and I think that until the author of this article understands that, he should expect people to balk at such backwash.

There&#039;s a lot of things on the internet that I don&#039;t agree with, and everyone is, of course, entitled to their opinion - but sometimes your opinion is wrong, and in this case, it was Games Radar&#039;s turn.  You can&#039;t hide that under the guise that it&#039;s just entertainment, because even entertainment can be absolutely wrong and utter garbage.  I stand by what I said, and if you happen to be the author of the article, I hope you do better research the next time you decide to write a piece like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, it&#8217;s an opinion piece, but it comes from such an ignorant point of view, something had to be said about it.  I&#8217;ve played many of these games, and as an artist, I&#8217;ve always appreciated them.  They are great examples of what you can do with a very restrictive medium, and I think that until the author of this article understands that, he should expect people to balk at such backwash.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of things on the internet that I don&#8217;t agree with, and everyone is, of course, entitled to their opinion &#8211; but sometimes your opinion is wrong, and in this case, it was Games Radar&#8217;s turn.  You can&#8217;t hide that under the guise that it&#8217;s just entertainment, because even entertainment can be absolutely wrong and utter garbage.  I stand by what I said, and if you happen to be the author of the article, I hope you do better research the next time you decide to write a piece like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vir</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>Vir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 16:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m about a year late to the party but there is some dire need for clarification. 

@HighwayChild: where did you get 45%? That is beyond incorrect. In TalkRadar Episode 46 they confronted this very topic. As of then, less than 2% of their content registered under the tags &quot;Sexy and Babes&quot; which are the tags they use for those articles. 2 percent. Though thank you for defending GR. Very much appreciated. 

@xot: &quot;I subscribe to the GamesRadar RSS feed, but only to find more interesting articles posted elsewhere. Actually, I don’t think I do anymore, I was getting too much crap. I have been ignoring my RSS feeds for a couple of months which is why I’m not sure.&quot; Really? I subscribe to their RSS feed to find better articles. Actually I don&#039;t. Cuz I don&#039;t actually pay attention to it so I&#039;m not sure. This isn&#039;t elementary school anymore, quit trying to sound cool. You just come off as uninformed. 

@Martin: You expect an article in which you agree with 100% of the content? Not gonna happen. For example I disagree strongly with your blogpost here and you have some valid arguments but I&#039;m not damning you for it. I&#039;m not calling it garbage, or peppering it with strong words. I&#039;m accepting that the internet is a big enough for both of us. I agree that Mirror&#039;s Edge and Sonic were beautiful games. I agree that it&#039;s unfair to knock old games for looking old. But all I have to do is not read the article, or at WORST post in the comments &quot;Yeah I think Mirror&#039;s Edge was a really pretty game&quot;. CRISIS AVERTED. If the internet was everything you agreed with, wouldn&#039;t you find it pretty boring? How long can you really go in a world of yes men. Opinion is the spice of the internet. It&#039;s how you deal with it that decides the rest of the entree. 

GamesRadar is not a site to go to for your gaming news. By the editors own admission, you would be crazy to visit GR for that. There are a million other sites dedicated to that. If you want entertaining frivolous articles that are written for FUN, then go to GamesRadar. Clearly you don&#039;t like what they do, so quit visiting the site. It&#039;s a big internet guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m about a year late to the party but there is some dire need for clarification. </p>
<p>@HighwayChild: where did you get 45%? That is beyond incorrect. In TalkRadar Episode 46 they confronted this very topic. As of then, less than 2% of their content registered under the tags &#8220;Sexy and Babes&#8221; which are the tags they use for those articles. 2 percent. Though thank you for defending GR. Very much appreciated. </p>
<p>@xot: &#8220;I subscribe to the GamesRadar RSS feed, but only to find more interesting articles posted elsewhere. Actually, I don’t think I do anymore, I was getting too much crap. I have been ignoring my RSS feeds for a couple of months which is why I’m not sure.&#8221; Really? I subscribe to their RSS feed to find better articles. Actually I don&#8217;t. Cuz I don&#8217;t actually pay attention to it so I&#8217;m not sure. This isn&#8217;t elementary school anymore, quit trying to sound cool. You just come off as uninformed. </p>
<p>@Martin: You expect an article in which you agree with 100% of the content? Not gonna happen. For example I disagree strongly with your blogpost here and you have some valid arguments but I&#8217;m not damning you for it. I&#8217;m not calling it garbage, or peppering it with strong words. I&#8217;m accepting that the internet is a big enough for both of us. I agree that Mirror&#8217;s Edge and Sonic were beautiful games. I agree that it&#8217;s unfair to knock old games for looking old. But all I have to do is not read the article, or at WORST post in the comments &#8220;Yeah I think Mirror&#8217;s Edge was a really pretty game&#8221;. CRISIS AVERTED. If the internet was everything you agreed with, wouldn&#8217;t you find it pretty boring? How long can you really go in a world of yes men. Opinion is the spice of the internet. It&#8217;s how you deal with it that decides the rest of the entree. </p>
<p>GamesRadar is not a site to go to for your gaming news. By the editors own admission, you would be crazy to visit GR for that. There are a million other sites dedicated to that. If you want entertaining frivolous articles that are written for FUN, then go to GamesRadar. Clearly you don&#8217;t like what they do, so quit visiting the site. It&#8217;s a big internet guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy1</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-5402</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:21:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-5402</guid>
		<description>45% of their articles are about boobs or farts?
Where did you get that number?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>45% of their articles are about boobs or farts?<br />
Where did you get that number?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-5102</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-5102</guid>
		<description>I think you missed the point of my rant there, Highway Child.  I wasn&#039;t complaining about the entertainment value of the site.  I was complaining about how wrong the article in question was.

It&#039;s one thing to spend half your time writing articles about how much you like boobs and farts.  That&#039;s fine with me, and though it makes the seem very unprofessional, some people dig that.  What I do not like is people writing articles and speaking from an authoritative position on a subject that they clearly do not understand.  How many people will read the article I mentioned and think that everything isn the article is 100% factual and true?

It&#039;s great to have a sense of humor, and to entertain your site&#039;s visitors.  But when you try your hand at journalism, check the facts please.  With the internet at your fingertips, you have no excuse not to, and I will not &quot;lay off&quot; when stupid people spread wrongful information just because they are too lazy to do some basic research.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you missed the point of my rant there, Highway Child.  I wasn&#8217;t complaining about the entertainment value of the site.  I was complaining about how wrong the article in question was.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to spend half your time writing articles about how much you like boobs and farts.  That&#8217;s fine with me, and though it makes the seem very unprofessional, some people dig that.  What I do not like is people writing articles and speaking from an authoritative position on a subject that they clearly do not understand.  How many people will read the article I mentioned and think that everything isn the article is 100% factual and true?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to have a sense of humor, and to entertain your site&#8217;s visitors.  But when you try your hand at journalism, check the facts please.  With the internet at your fingertips, you have no excuse not to, and I will not &#8220;lay off&#8221; when stupid people spread wrongful information just because they are too lazy to do some basic research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Highway Child</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>Highway Child</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 21:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>Well, here we go again. Another blogger complaining about the content on GamesRadar.com. You know, what I don&#039;t understand, is how someone can read a few articles from a site and call the whole site a rotten cesspool of profanity and unprofessional nonsense.

I once read an article stating that all that the journalists at GR wrote about was tits and farting. Do you know how many articles on GR are about tits and farts, pro-blogger Martin?

45%.

45% of the articles on GamesRadar pertained to boobs and farts. Now, what was the other, what? 55% of the writing on that website? You say it&#039;s unprofessional blabber, no? Well, I love harshly criticizing what people do for a living, but isn&#039;t this a tad stupid? What, do you think that GR is three guys who work on the website together online? What&#039;s this I hear, then? They actually have two major office buildings?

You know, I have to admit, the articles on the UK side of GR are pretty bad, but you can&#039;t just drive a whole site into the ground because of some of the things there. You know, it may be obscene, but when I&#039;m not reading IGN or Gamespot for news, I go to GR. Why? Because it&#039;s funny, goofy, irreverent... no-- entertaining as a whole!

Lay off for a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here we go again. Another blogger complaining about the content on GamesRadar.com. You know, what I don&#8217;t understand, is how someone can read a few articles from a site and call the whole site a rotten cesspool of profanity and unprofessional nonsense.</p>
<p>I once read an article stating that all that the journalists at GR wrote about was tits and farting. Do you know how many articles on GR are about tits and farts, pro-blogger Martin?</p>
<p>45%.</p>
<p>45% of the articles on GamesRadar pertained to boobs and farts. Now, what was the other, what? 55% of the writing on that website? You say it&#8217;s unprofessional blabber, no? Well, I love harshly criticizing what people do for a living, but isn&#8217;t this a tad stupid? What, do you think that GR is three guys who work on the website together online? What&#8217;s this I hear, then? They actually have two major office buildings?</p>
<p>You know, I have to admit, the articles on the UK side of GR are pretty bad, but you can&#8217;t just drive a whole site into the ground because of some of the things there. You know, it may be obscene, but when I&#8217;m not reading IGN or Gamespot for news, I go to GR. Why? Because it&#8217;s funny, goofy, irreverent&#8230; no&#8211; entertaining as a whole!</p>
<p>Lay off for a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Rhodes</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-4098</link>
		<dc:creator>James Rhodes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 08:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-4098</guid>
		<description>I still prefer classics over 3D modern games, simply because of their style.  Especially when the 3D gets in the way of gameplay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still prefer classics over 3D modern games, simply because of their style.  Especially when the 3D gets in the way of gameplay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xDanielx</title>
		<link>http://blog.martincrownover.com/2009/03/18/fugly-gamesradar-article/comment-page-1/#comment-3945</link>
		<dc:creator>xDanielx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 01:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.martincrownover.com/?p=967#comment-3945</guid>
		<description>The real winner:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DTjLG3usQo
:-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real winner:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DTjLG3usQo" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2DTjLG3usQo</a><br />
 <img src='http://blog.martincrownover.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

