Comments on: Crysis Demo Impressions

By: abacus

abacus — Sun, 06 Jan 2008 21:22:55 +0000

I agree, the game sucks. It doesn’t even have good visuals because of how low the LOD has to be to achieve a playable framerate. I found that bushes and stuff would pop up literally 3 feet from me, and then wouldn’t look al lthat great. CoD4 has way better graphics.

By: tuntis

tuntis — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 13:57:15 +0000

Play the real game. I think it gets a bit funnier to play after the first level: and the physics are fun to kill enemies with. Cloaking inside an enemy base slowly killing them all off while they wonder where you are can also be fun to do (for a short while).

I myself enjoyed playing it, although it was short.

By: matt

matt — Wed, 21 Nov 2007 01:06:39 +0000

those are some cool graphics. its a shame alex doesnt make something like this in gm. he can do some crazy shit.

By: FredFredrickson

FredFredrickson — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:50:07 +0000

Well it’s getting good reviews… but I still stand by my opinion that it’s just a regurgitation of Far Cry. And I wouldn’t upgrade my computer for this game.

By: Chessdude

Chessdude — Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:45:46 +0000

Crysis is terrible? Good grief, I’ve been sitting on the edge of my seat for a while for this game. I haven’t bothered with any game demos since Age of Empires 3, when I played, enjoyed, and yet didn’t discover that my computer can’t handle the graphics as well as it should be able to (it lags to about 5 FPS whenever I fire a cannonball, yet the rest of the game plays superfast). Anyway, I’m hoping that the demo isn’t indicative of anything to come, and that Crysis meets my original expectations for it.

By: GMmarine

GMmarine — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:45:47 +0000

I kind of agree with you, it may have the most realistic graphics but if it doesn’t have any new gameplay it doesn’t really matter. But then again since I have dial-up and a $500 computer I can’t really give my opinion…